Transparency in our decision making | Nature Microbiology OJPAS® The journal decision-making process is indeed a long and complex one and the authors are not always clear about each step in the process. Examiners should now reject product claims drawn solely to naturally occurring nucleic acids or fragments thereof, whether isolated or not, as being ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C . Like all academic journals, Nature relies on peer-review. Appeal to the editor. The authors share their experience with addressing reviewers' comments to get a manuscript accepted and published. If the author believes the decision to reject the submission was not in accordance with journal policy and procedures, the author may appeal the decision by providing the Editor with a detailed point by point response to reviewer and editor comments. Chief Editor, Nature Biomedical Engineering, Nature Research. Nature | Acceptance/Rejection Rate, Submission Experiences, Editor ... Sach said: My PI submitted a manuscipt to a journal in January. (accept/revise or reject) and, 2) final decision (accept/reject). Desk reject Assign papers to ACs Recommend reviewers for papers At least 3 reviewers each . Just now it says "awaiting EIC decision". When should you challenge an editors decision to reject a paper? If you need to include a cover letter with your submission, you should address the editor by formal name (e.g. At each stage, the editor will discuss the manuscript. Frequently Asked Questions - Springer Accept, but only after minor . Accept, but only after major revisions. This peer review tutorial will give you the skills needed to evaluate another researcher's manuscript in a way that will help a journal Editor make a decision about publication.
Pilze Und Steppenraute, Articles D